Randall made contributions, Edwards 36+4+4, Huazi celebrated Gobert s interview after the game

This game made my blood pressure soar. In the first quarter, the two teams made a game like a match. Edwards and Conley suddenly fired and led 8-2; the Warriors tied 6-0, and the Timberwolves overtook 8-0 - this is not a game, it is clearly a kid who grabs candy, and you grabs me and you won't stop.

finished 21-21 in the first quarter and tied. The second quarter of

is even more outrageous. The Timberwolves had a happy three-pointer in the first half, and the score was opened 13-4, and they were about to start. As a result, the team only relied on Huazi's free throw and scored 1 point, and the Warriors took the opportunity to overtake. When I was behind 40-42 at halftime, I sighed at the screen: Is this Timberwolve really a "good dragon and adverse insect"?

But the third section is different. When Gobert was forced to end the game for four fouls, my heart was irritated - without this big gate to protect the basket, the Warriors must not be crazy? As a result, Huazi stood up, dunked and added three points, and forced the gap to 69-73.

The most exciting thing is the fourth section. The Timberwolves made two three-pointers in a row, and the Warriors Kumingga and Butler were not out of weakness, and the scores were as if they were stuck together. Until Huazi made a three-pointer on the top of the arc and overtook, Zhu Meng Green left the court with 6 fouls. The referee's whistle sounded, and the Timberwolves' eyes changed.

Randall assisted Gobert to score 2+1, and I directly slapped my thigh. When Hilde scored a three-pointer when he led 7 points, but Randle helped Huazi with a three-pointer with a backhand - this kid helped 12 assists in the game, making his teammates so full of oil.

The final score was 102-97, and the Timberwolves led 2-1.

Talk about data: Huazi scored 36 points, 4 rebounds and 4 assists, engraved the "offensive kaleidoscope" into DNA; Randall had a triple-double of 24+10+12, and his organizational ability was more stable than Conley; Gobert scored 9 points, 13 rebounds and 4 hats, but he didn't think he scored less, he was standing at the basket with a wall, and the Warriors had to go around all the breakthroughs.

Looking at the Warriors, Butler was tough enough with 33+7+7, Kuming scored 30 points and 6 rebounds, but without Curry's Warriors, the three-pointer was like a lottery draw - 0 three-pointers in the first half, and Hield scored 14 points in the second half to save some games. After the game, Huazi and his teammates celebrating the spirit of high-fives, like a new recruit who had just won the battle. Gobert said in an interview: "If you grab one more rebound on the defensive end, you can leave another chance for the offense." This is true - today he blocked 13 rebounds and 4 blocks, and the Warriors scored 38 points in the penalty area, 10 points less than the Timberwolves. Isn't this the gap?

But the Timberwolves also exposed the problem. I only scored 1 point in the second quarter, and my stability was even worse than the Warriors' old fry. If the power is cut off again in a critical battle, the Warriors will not be polite.

Youth is a double-edged sword. The Timberwolves have obvious physical advantages, and they rely on overtaking in the last quarter to not be able to die; but lack of experience also makes them prone to floating in good times. On the other hand, the Warriors, Butler and Kumingga carried the team to play. If they hadn't left the game early, it would be hard to say who would win.

Who do you think the most important thing in this game is to win? Huazi's score exploded? Randall's organizational connection? Or Gobert's defensive gate? I think it is the team - when Huazi's main attacker, Randall controls the field, and Gobert protects the basket, this young Timberwolves is really qualified to shout "The future is promising."

Do you think the Timberwolves can win the Western Conference Final in one go?

Statement: The information in this article comes from the Internet and is not guaranteed to be completely correct and is for reference only.